Tuesday Thoughts
Tuesday, October 14th, 2008* It can’t be good for the NBA that everyone is more excited for tonight’s Draft lottery than for any of the remaining playoff games. The NBA sort of reminds me of The Simpsons these days: Unwatchable and a glimmer of their former selves. (In two weeks, we might be adding Entourage to this list. I can’t think of any TV show in recent memory that got so bad so quickly. It’s like all the writers bolted to other shows and the producers were forced to hire the guys who were canned when Yes, Dear went off the air.)
And why does it seem like the Celtics are the only team that has ever had the lottery go against them? Why doesn’t Minnesota complain about not getting Shaq in ‘92? Shouldn’t Golden State have beef with the system because they were denied Yao in ‘02? And surely the Bulls are still steaming that the ‘01 lottery was won by Washington, allowing the Bullets to take future Hall of Famer Kwame Brown. But, nooo, all we hear about is the freakin’ Celtics missing out on Tim Duncan. Shut up. I hope they get the fourth pick and end up taking Joakim Noah. Man, that’d be sweet.
* re: Clinton Portis’ defense of Michael Vick: Why are these comments drawing harsher criticism than the acts themselves? The lack of uproar over Vick’s dog-fighting ring has been baffling, considering his “star” status and the low-brow nature of his alleged crimes. This is a great story for the media, yet most major outlets (with ESPN leading the way) have largely swept it under the rug.
As for Portis; is anyone really surprised? The man has a stripper pole in his basement. Do we really expect, or need, him to have values that are in line with the common man?
Anyone who is “outraged” that somebody could be so callous about dog-fighting outrages me with their naivity. Look, dog fighting is disgusting and I hope whoever is guilty in the Vick affair gets a harsh sentense. But dog fighting clearly is a much bigger part of southern culture than anybody wants to admit, so much so that Clinton Portis claims he can get to one whenever he wants. Is that wrong? Of course. It’s also illegal. But nobody expects Clinton Portis to be our moral authority. That’s what we have Al Sharpton for.
Speaking of Sharpton, the slow-uproar over CP’s comments are quite reminiscent of the Don Imus “controversy” as the media is trying to drum up outrage about something that nobody seems to care about too much. It’s especially interesting that CP’s words are getting so much play when, again, Vick has been skating on this issue for weeks. Plus, Portis made his idiotic comments on Saturday, yet they didn’t get major media attention until Monday, despite the fact that many blogs were discussing the issue almost immediately. Why the delay?